• Welcome to The Audio Annex! If you have any trouble logging in or signing up, please contact 'admin - at - theaudioannex.com'. Enjoy!
  • HTTPS (secure web browser connection) has been enabled - just add "https://" to the start of the URL in your address bar, e.g. "https://theaudioannex.com/forum/"
  • Congratulations! If you're seeing this notice, it means you're connected to the new server. Go ahead and post as usual, enjoy!
  • I've just upgraded the forum software to Xenforo 2.0. Please let me know if you have any problems with it. I'm still working on installing styles... coming soon.

What do you do with a perfect masterpiece that will always be a fake?

Wow, had never heard of that (supposed) artist, or that scandal. Fascinating that nobody noticed earlier.
 
I don't see why anyone would have noticed. I got the impression that the audio was manipulated that it'd take a side-by-side comparison in a digital audio visualization program to be able to tell.

I'm intrigued by the question and by the response. Every one of the people in the piece said that they'd disposed of the recordings. I guess I can see why a critic wouldn't be interested in a digitally altered recording, but if the altered recording was something that one found moving BEFORE they knew it was altered I'd think that it'd be just a short moving AFTER gaining that knowledge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top