• Welcome to The Audio Annex! If you have any trouble logging in or signing up, please contact 'admin - at - theaudioannex.com'. Enjoy!
  • HTTPS (secure web browser connection) has been enabled - just add "https://" to the start of the URL in your address bar, e.g. "https://theaudioannex.com/forum/"
  • Congratulations! If you're seeing this notice, it means you're connected to the new server. Go ahead and post as usual, enjoy!
  • I've just upgraded the forum software to Xenforo 2.0. Please let me know if you have any problems with it. I'm still working on installing styles... coming soon.

Professor Wants to Drug Climate Skeptics

GreatDane

GreatDane

Well-Known Member
The face of twisted bizarreness and the coveted Skeksy Award. :laughing-rolling:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IswA63-Zqkw[/youtube]
 
DIYer said:
Now we know more about youtube.
Click to expand...

What? That it is a private company and they reserve the right to approve/limit what appears on thier site?

They have no obligation to show anything and if the powers that be at YouTube vehemently disagree with or find particular content inappropriate oh well.
 
mzpro5 said:
DIYer said:
Now we know more about youtube.
Click to expand...

What? That it is a private company and they reserve the right to approve/limit what appears on thier site?..........
Click to expand...



Not trying to pile on, but I see DIYer's pov. I did not know they were privately owned, but they are probably the biggest site for video on the web so for that video to be pulled just doesn't set right with me. IMO, seems like they just show their political view by removing that video. Sure it's their right and all, but I think it would be better if they just kept the playing field even.
 
mzpro5 said:
What? That it is a private company and they reserve the right to approve/limit what appears on thier site?
Click to expand...
I'm already aware of that.

They have no obligation to show anything and if the powers that be at YouTube vehemently disagree with or find particular content inappropriate oh well.
Click to expand...
I'm already aware of this also. It's what they chose that I know better now.
 
Yesfan70 said:
...but I think it would be better if they just kept the playing field even.
Click to expand...

Bingo!

Did anyone watch the video linked?

(from this paragraph)

Indeed, videos made by global warming alarmist groups showing children being blown up and having their guts splatted everywhere for not reducing their carbon footprint are apparently fine by You Tube, but suggesting Norgaard isn’t the most attractive woman on the planet is tantamount to hate speech.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfnddMpzPsM[/youtube]
:angry-cussingblack:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top