lovemytoys
Active Member
i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
lovemytoys said:i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
lovemytoys said:i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
Theoretically, the only better match would be another pair of Studio 20's. In real-world practice, I think the Studio 10's will work beautifully!lovemytoys said:i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
PaulyT said:Welcome! Great to have you hear, sit back and enjoy!
lovemytoys said:i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
But if you listen to a lot of multi-channel music, it might be more important to get the blend closer.
JeffMackwood said:PaulyT said:Welcome! Great to have you hear, sit back and enjoy!
lovemytoys said:i have studiio 20v5 as front what do you think studio10v5 for rears??
But if you listen to a lot of multi-channel music, it might be more important to get the blend closer.
REALLY agree with PaulyT on this point.
I'm a huge believer in using the same speakers all 'round - and all aligned physically - especially for multi-channel music. The closer you get to this the better. But realities may dictate less.
Jeff
Yesfan70 said:The 20s only go 8Hz lower than the 10s and both have 1Hz difference in the low frequency extension (36hz for the 20s, 37Hz for the 10s). The difference in price is $400. Is it worth it?
Unless he listens to a lot of multi-channel music, I don't know if I could justify that difference. If it's a lot of movies and stereo music, I would say save the money and stick with the 10s for the surrounds. This is especially true since he's still adding a bluray player and sub to the mix.
Randy said:Yesfan70 said:The 20s only go 8Hz lower than the 10s and both have 1Hz difference in the low frequency extension (36hz for the 20s, 37Hz for the 10s). The difference in price is $400. Is it worth it?
Unless he listens to a lot of multi-channel music, I don't know if I could justify that difference. If it's a lot of movies and stereo music, I would say save the money and stick with the 10s for the surrounds. This is especially true since he's still adding a bluray player and sub to the mix.
For surround use, I would guess the answer is no. If we were talking about using them for mains then I would probably say yes, cuz I think the 20's would offer more in the area of intangibles.
Yesfan70 said:JeffMackwood said:REALLY agree with PaulyT on this point.
I'm a huge believer in using the same speakers all 'round - and all aligned physically - especially for multi-channel music. The closer you get to this the better. But realities may dictate less.
Jeff
The 20s only go 8Hz lower than the 10s and both have 1Hz difference in the low frequency extension (36hz for the 20s, 37Hz for the 10s). The difference in price is $400. Is it worth it?
Unless he listens to a lot of multi-channel music, I don't know if I could justify that difference. If it's a lot of movies and stereo music, I would say save the money and stick with the 10s for the surrounds. This is especially true since he's still adding a bluray player and sub to the mix.