Srvy
Well-Known Member
Maybe interesting original was a bit corny in the 80s but I liked it.
Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGoe7BdGdlg
Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGoe7BdGdlg
You forgot one, E. T.Yesfan70 said:So who is the invading country? North Korea? China?
DIYer said:You forgot one, E. T.Yesfan70 said:So who is the invading country? North Korea? China?
That's a bad start. That country doesn't have enough tech, natural resources or population to pull off something even close to this. If it's China instead, then it's more credible but I think I know why Hollywood won't make it so. :shhh:mzpro5 said:North Koreans.
It appears they are using some type of EMP device to shut down anything electrical and such a device is not all that difficult to make. And they have made several nukes.DIYer said:That's a bad start. That country doesn't have enough tech, natural resources or population to pull off something even close to this. If it's China instead, then it's more credible but I think I know why Hollywood won't make it so. :shhh:mzpro5 said:North Koreans.
Their $6 billion/yr vs US's $549.4 billion/yr. Big difference in how it's funded.mzpro5 said:About their military, North Korea is the most militarized country in the world having the fourth largest Army at about 1.1 million active personnel, spending approximately 6 billion USD a year. 20% of men between 17-54 are active military troops. They also have about 3.5 million in a reserve called Worker Peasent Red Guard.
DIYer said:......If it's China instead, then it's more credible but I think I know why Hollywood won't make it so. :shhh:
Yes, it's political. But then, they picked Australian actor as the lead character. :roll:Yesfan70 said:Because most of the equipment Hollywood uses is made from China?? That "don't bite the hand that feeds you" comment makes sense now.
If you happen to have a copy of that hold on to it.JeffMackwood said:If you want to read a book about China invading the US, I recommend Invasion. I read it when it first came out in paperback. Neat escapism story with elements of Clancy etc. Some very interesting characters - and character development (beyond what you'd normally expect from such a tale). Would have made a FAR better screenplay / movie than (either) Red Dawn.
DIYer said:Yes, it's political. But then, they picked Australian actor as the lead character. :roll:Yesfan70 said:Because most of the equipment Hollywood uses is made from China?? That "don't bite the hand that feeds you" comment makes sense now.
mzpro5 said:If you happen to have a copy of that hold on to it.JeffMackwood said:If you want to read a book about China invading the US, I recommend Invasion. I read it when it first came out in paperback. Neat escapism story with elements of Clancy etc. Some very interesting characters - and character development (beyond what you'd normally expect from such a tale). Would have made a FAR better screenplay / movie than (either) Red Dawn.
Appears to be out of print and copies are going for a fair amount.
Oh well... :eusa-whistle:DIYer said:My guess is, this will be a flop.
From Roger Ebert review:
If you're wondering how North Korea (population 25 million) can raise enough invaders to attack the Unites States (population 315 million), it may help to understand that the original screenplay for this remake named the invaders as Chinese. After principal photography was completed on this film three years ago and its studio (MGM) went belly-up, the enemy identity was changed to North Korea by reshooting several scenes, redubbing lots of dialogue and using digital adjustment to change the looks of flags, uniforms and insignia on trucks and tanks. Did this involve a change in ideology in Hollywood? Not really. A marketing genius figured out that China is one of the biggest markets for American movie exports, and North Korea generates unimpressive box-office bucks for Yank product, as the trade papers like to word it.