2chnfornow
Active Member
Opinions sought from any one with experience and or opinions on Dynaudio vs Mackie for active speakers.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Flint said:Depends on size. The larger Dyns are far superior to the Mackies. Dollar for dollar, the Mackies are better at the price they sell for. You have to spend more to get similar or better sound from the Dynaudio active speakers.
However, if you can spend more, the higher end Dyns are superior.
Flint said:I'd start with the Dyanaudio BM5 and go up to the BM12, if you can afford it.
Rope said:
Yesfan70 said:Not to say anything bad about the Mackies, but I went back to Klipsch after having the 824s for a couple of years. I loved their amount of detail, but I really missed how dynamic my old Klipsch towers were. If the active Dyns are like anything I heard in Atlanta a few years ago, I would probably pick them between the two you listed.
Do the speakers have to be active? You have a lot more offerings if you can go to passive speakers.
Flint said:Okay... if you live in a small studio apartment and don't intend to play the speakers loud, I would get the smaller BM5 speakers. I was giving advice based on the weaknesses of the Mackies, which is peak output and room filling ability. All of the Dynaudio speakers offer slightly better "resolution" or detail than the Mackies, even at lower volumes. So, if you are not trying to significantly blow the Mackies away, then the smaller Dyn's are good.