Akula, you ignorant slut! You are so wrong on this one it makes one's head spin. A spit take is not extreme enough of a reaction. You should be flogged and left to sweat in the high desert while tied to four posts on the ground.
Hunt for Red October was poorly acted with the worst casting in human history. The great Sean Connery was weak. Douchebag poser Alec Baldwin and his permanent kissy-face expression was comical for a character who spent more time standing and thinking while staring at the various scenes he was trying to figure out. Harrison Ford nailed those moments, but Baldwin look confused and like a bad actor forced into a role he could not comprehend. Add to that the fact that all the Russian characters had Russian accents but Connery could not do an accent. If the star cannot do the accent, then don't make it more obvious by surrounding him with actors who do perfect accents. Yes, it represented the book pretty well, it chose some of the worst moments because they at least had action in them. BAH!
Yes, Sum of All Fears was bad, but it was more comical bad and somewhat fun to watch on its own. Not to mention, the acting was at least decent. So, Hunt gets a 1 while Sum gets a 5 and all the Harrison movies get 8-10.