OK, now I'll go over that article posted in the other thread:
http://comicbookl.com/star-wars-the-last-jedis-biggest-disappointments/
My responses:
10 (Snoke's identity)- So? The emperor was never developed in the original trilogy (and with the EU now being non-canonical, there's no reason for the Empire's massive military buildup). Vader was never developed in the original movie. Nobody seems all butthurt that Blofeld's background is never explored. Nobody gives a rip if Hans Gruber was bullied as a child. A villain is a villain. Yes, I agree I'd like to know his back story, but that's not a deal breaker at all.
9 (Rey's parents are nobodies)- Again, not bothered. In fact, I LIKE it. When combined with the little boy Force-summoning his broom at the end, it indicates the Force is being more democratized. There's more Force users than Luke, Leia, their families, and other rogue Sith or whatever. While everyone was speculating about her being a long lost sibling to Ben Skywalker or the result of Kenobi's one night stand, turns out her parents had as much impact on the story as the parents in most Disney stories.
8 (Luke's lightsaber)- Yeah, it seemed a little out of character for a Star Wars movie for Luke to toss it away for a laugh (it WAS funny, though). This was his dad's lightsaber, it would have been an heirloom. But given his state of mind, it's still believable- he was trying to renounce everything Jedi. This was an attempt to draw him back in. I think complaining that we were all worked up for a couple years only to be repaid like this just smacks of entitlement.
7 (Knights of Ren)- OK, I think he has a point with this, but honestly, until I read the article I'd completely forgotten about them. A minor continuity issue, but not enough of one to toss the movie. Heck, the original trilogy had more and bigger ones.
6 (Heroes made it worse)- Yes, they did. Indiana Jones was much the same in Raiders of the Lost Ark and people didn't seem to care. They still like that movie. It was a subversion of the usual Star Wars trope of renegades going their own way and saving everything. But part of the message of the film was breaking with the past and relative nobodies rising up to do the job, and in order to do that the Resistance needed to lose its military.
5 (Leia's force use)- OK, yeah, didn't see that coming. But complaining that it wasn't what was expected? Is the author mad because he wasn't the one asked to make the movie and the director didn't get his personal permission for everything? Again, the Force is manifesting in more people.
4 (Jedi books)- If Luke didn't find them until he made it to the island, he had already sworn off being a Jedi. So no, he wouldn't have bothered reading them. As Yoda said, they were a hard go anyway. And they'd managed to train Jedi without them before, so they obviously aren't THAT critical. As Luke said, the Jedi order were arrogant and ultimately a failure. So losing the last vestiges of their training may not be that big a deal.
3 (Phasma)- There's a LOT of characters in Star Wars who never got their own stories outside of the EU. Lando would make for an interesting one. General Tarkin. Mon Mothma. Not Boba Fett, I'm sick of that guy. Jabba. Now, they did build her up as something special, so I agree that, like Snoke, there's definitely a feeling that there's a lot more there that went untold. But people gush over Game of Thrones (another media that Gwendoline Christie is in), and they kill seemingly significant characters as casually as they take a drunken whiz.
2 (Crait battle)- OK, the Crait world just didn't do it for me. The effect of the skimmers rooster tailing was cool, but it went nowhere. But then, see the end of #6- the Resistance needed to lose. Hard. And even if they had "won" by blowing that big gun, help wasn't coming. They will have to subvert it some other way.
1 (final scene)- Yeah, it was really easy to miss. It could have used a little more to grab our attention, but does anybody else feel like he threw this in just to round out the whole ten?