This morning I was contemplating this discussion and thought of a way to discuss how unimportant this small this issue is. We seem to get consumed with every Hz of bass we might or might not be able to get and go to great lengths to do whatever it takes to force everything we've got into making the bass better. But the streetwise logic that just making all the woofers in the room be working at the same time in the bass range is always better (it must be, right?), is just wrong - and I guess that is counterintuitive.
If you look at this specific discussion, concerning the Revel Performa3 F206 tower speakers and a great subwoofer, Bryan was obsessed with getting his mains and subwoofers to operate at the same time in the bass range. This isn't logically correct, but it seems to be intuitive because surely a subwoofer working with four 6.5" woofers has certainly got to be better than the subwoofer working alone, right?
Bryan also mentioned in another threat he felt he was under-utilizing the F206 speakers if he didn't let them operate down to their natural bass limits in the 40Hz range. This, too, is a misconception of how speakers work. I showed with the NRC THD chart how much those speakers really struggle to generate low distortion output below 100Hz, so asking them to work hard below 100Hz when you have an amazing subwoofer which can handle those frequencies better doesn't make much sense.
S
o, to show that the F206 speakers still have a ton of work to do, even if you set them to "Small" with a 80Hz crossover frequency, I stole the NRC listening window response measurement on those speakers and overlaid some clarifying data points:
I put a translucent blue box over the range which are being "lost" if you set them to small and have an 80Hz crossover. That small range isn't much considering all the other work the speakers are expected to be doing well. In fact, it is a mere 13% of the total operating range of the speaker and it is the portion of the range which the speakers struggle the most to do well at all. Why would you insist on making your speakers work hard in their worst performing range if it wasn't necessary?
Now, with crossovers all of the output in that "lost" range isn't actually lost. The crossover operates on a slope, meaning it rolls off the output as the frequency gets lower. So, at 80Hz it is 3dB quieter than at 110Hz and at 40Hz is it either 12dB or 18dB quieter than the output at 80Hz. That means it isn't 10dB down (which his where most consider the contribution to be impactful to the sound) until about 53Hz - assuming a common 12dB per octave slope. So, the main speakers will still have an audible contribution to the sound in the room potentially down to approximately 53Hz even when you set them to "small" with a 80Hz crossover. That impact is extremely small at 53Hz, but it is significant down to about 66Hz where the signal is about 6dB down. So, one isn't flat out sacrificing the main speakers' bass potential completely when setting to small with a 80Hz crossover, they are just limiting the contribution.
Now, if you owned a pair of main speakers which can generate loud, clean, powerful and dynamic output to well below 40Hz, I would say to set them to "large" and not have a subwoofer at all. Or, I'd recommend a preamp/processor with a more advanced bass management system so you could set the crossover to 40Hz, but that's a different situation than Bryan finds himself in.