heeman said:I have sample screen material from Carada and Screen Innovations and we compared all of these against the white wall and let me tell you it was very hard to tell the difference and in most situations, we could not. This begs to reason, how much to spend on a screen?????
JeffMackwood said:heeman said:I have sample screen material from Carada and Screen Innovations and we compared all of these against the white wall and let me tell you it was very hard to tell the difference and in most situations, we could not. This begs to reason, how much to spend on a screen?????
To repeat myself: a lot.
Buy the best acoustically-transparent weave material you can get (Draper's AT1200 - now called XT900E - would be it) for the combination of best picture AND the ability to locate your centre speaker like it should be: directly behind the centre of the screen - without any acoustic effects.
Hey! You're starting from scratch. Why limit yourself to the inferior?!
You asked.
Keith,heeman said:Jeff,
I do not have enough depth in the room to position the speakers behind the screen...........
So, inferior it will have to be!
JeffMackwood said:heeman said:I have sample screen material from Carada and Screen Innovations and we compared all of these against the white wall and let me tell you it was very hard to tell the difference and in most situations, we could not. This begs to reason, how much to spend on a screen?????
To repeat myself: a lot.
Buy the best acoustically-transparent weave material you can get (Draper's AT1200 - now called XT900E - would be it) for the combination of best picture AND the ability to locate your centre speaker like it should be: directly behind the centre of the screen - without any acoustic effects.
Hey! You're starting from scratch. Why limit yourself to the inferior?!
You asked.
Bats,Batman said:JeffMackwood said:heeman said:I have sample screen material from Carada and Screen Innovations and we compared all of these against the white wall and let me tell you it was very hard to tell the difference and in most situations, we could not. This begs to reason, how much to spend on a screen?????
To repeat myself: a lot.
Buy the best acoustically-transparent weave material you can get (Draper's AT1200 - now called XT900E - would be it) for the combination of best picture AND the ability to locate your centre speaker like it should be: directly behind the centre of the screen - without any acoustic effects.
Hey! You're starting from scratch. Why limit yourself to the inferior?!
You asked.
I can't be completely convinced that this the way to go. Especially with the capabilities of the JVC. If absolutely the closest thing to perfect sound must be achieved and PQ is a DISTANT 2nd, then maybe, BUT then why even purchase a projector in the class of the X35. I can't get on board with the idea that that is necessary for movies. And in that sense, an acoustical screen can only degrade the PQ of the JVC. The perforations give a visual repesentation of screen door effect or pixelation that isn't present in the actual image of the JVCs. I guess it depends on which side of the fence your on to decide whether the greater sacrifices should be made for audio or video. I think in this case a perfed screen is too much of a sacrifice when the investment Keith has made in video is factored more heavily... :twocents-mytwocents: