Flint said:To be honest, I find it pretty pretentious. The way rattles off dozens of statistics from the top of his mind is annoying, and some not relevant to much. It sounds like someone who spent months tweaking the most perfect monoloque on why America isn't the greatest country in the world to make it the most absolutely perfect argument one can make, without any opportunity for rebuttal on any point made (and there were many points being made), it just sounds like a writer making an argument after years of failure. It is just to tidy, pre-scripted sounding, and carefully worded for me to appreciate it. I also don't find it "honest", just controversial. I get tired of the idea that anything which attacks any perceived "status quo" as being honest only because it appears to attack the status quo.
If it were honest, it would include a comparison with other nations on all those statistics. For instance, is any one country consistently higher on the list of negative statistics or is it all over the place where no single nation can claim to be better in every case? I don't know. There were also some VERY politically one sided statements in this seemingly perfecty scripted tyrade in which assumptions of facts cannot be proven, just driven by political opinions. Meanwhile, as Sorkin is very apt to do, he couches those extreme views between commonly held beliefs of all Americans so as to call attention away from them. Kinda like hiding a pill inside a piece of meat to fool the dog into taking the pill.
This is probably a fun show to watch, and I enjoy political discourse and even one sided viewpoints, but I definitely don't think this rant is the "most honest" anything.
But that's just my view. It is purely entertainment intended to make money for everyone involved anyway.
Flint said:Of course it is scripted. I was pointing out that it is written and performed as if it was very carefully planned out, even though the situation they set up is supposed to make this rant seem made up on the spot. .
Flint said:By the way, this is a really well thought out argument and I love seeing that. While I don't agree, at least it is logical, cogent, and makes it point very well. The weaknesses in it I have already discussed. I prefer less emotionally driven political arguments and this argument has fewer emotional and irrational points than most. There are still a few stuffed in, but they are not the sole argument.
Botch said:What points do you disagree with, Flint? Most of the stats are correct to my knowledge.
Flint said:But I disagree with more than half of the points he makes while completely agreeing with most of the rest. That's the problem I have with it. It would mean so much more if something like this were natural and real (as portrayed) rather than something from a book.
I could just as easily post a video clip of an actor doing an amazing job with the monologue from John Galt in Atlas Shrugged and claim it was the most honest 15 minutes in broadcast history. It is just another well crafted tyrade from a good writer.
And Arachnaphobia :happy-smileygiantred:Srvy said:Flint said:But I disagree with more than half of the points he makes while completely agreeing with most of the rest. That's the problem I have with it. It would mean so much more if something like this were natural and real (as portrayed) rather than something from a book.
I could just as easily post a video clip of an actor doing an amazing job with the monologue from John Galt in Atlas Shrugged and claim it was the most honest 15 minutes in broadcast history. It is just another well crafted tyrade from a good writer.
That acting job was pretty good to maybe win Jeff a Emmy to make up for the Oscar he should have gotten for Dumb and Dumber :text-lol: