Babs said:This was late into last evening for us. All in all, I really enjoyed this. I feel Daniel Day-Lewis just nailed his character! As for me, I always enjoy Leonardo. IMO...an incredible actor!
That is a Favorite movie of mine.
DIYer said:I missed your post for some reason. :doh:Botch said:
Okay, tonight's the first time I've seen this flick, part of my <$10 bluray grab-bag this last xmas season.
It started out as an okay science-fiction flick, but kind've ended as a gothic horror flick. :shock: The Vangelis soundtrack was good (given the period) but I gotta admit I didn't know what the hell was going on towards the end (merlot's fault). Impressive, visually. Some fun "period" slips (don't know when this movie was originally made):
a. so many LA'ers smoking, in 2018???
b. covering yourself from the rain, with a paper newspaper, instead of an iPad? In 2018??
c. a skyscraper-high Coca-cola ad, I get. But on only one skyscraper??? Heh!
d. oh wait, there's a "Pan Am" ad in the background! Who?
e. Continuous rain throughout the movie? in LA? Oh yeah, global warming by 2018.
f. There is no (f)
Its fun to see the obsolete portions of my dad's sci-fi books that I devoured in my late teens/early 20's ("Set course for Sector 9-3!" and the ensigns whip out their slide rules…) but seeing some things so out of date, in a movie made in my own lifetime…. ouch. :|
Uh..., Botch, this was the quintessential sci-fi movie of the 80's (The Matrix being the one for the 90's). Where have you been? Unless you're not into this genre. BTW, there have been 2 different cuts of this movie since the original release. The one you saw (final cut) isn't what the idea this movie was meant to be. It's a butchered version of it and has lost its potency. The original version is available in the market but now that you've seen the butchered one first, it may not work. You can still try it though.
There are two long drawn out threads over at AVS regarding what Deckard is supposed to be. Despite the person who started one of the threads, they have lots of input on why it ruins the movie by changing / butchering (by Ridley Scott) what was already established.Haywood said:I think the Director's Cut is the best version of the movie, although the voice-over in the theatrical added to the film noir feel of the film. It did not age entirely well due to the very 80s hair and make-up mixed up with the retro-40s look. Still, I think Rutger Hauer's soliloquy (ships on fire off the shores of Orion, etc) is one of the coolest bits I've seen in a sci-fi flick. Then there is the irony of realizing that Decker himself is a replicant. Great movie. One of my faves.
DIYer said:There are two long drawn out threads over at AVS regarding what Deckard is supposed to be. Despite the person who started one of the threads, they have lots of input on why it ruins the movie by changing / butchering (by Ridley Scott) what was already established.Haywood said:I think the Director's Cut is the best version of the movie, although the voice-over in the theatrical added to the film noir feel of the film. It did not age entirely well due to the very 80s hair and make-up mixed up with the retro-40s look. Still, I think Rutger Hauer's soliloquy (ships on fire off the shores of Orion, etc) is one of the coolest bits I've seen in a sci-fi flick. Then there is the irony of realizing that Decker himself is a replicant. Great movie. One of my faves.
walls said:Hansel and Gretal Witch Hunters
Ok this is definitely a turn your brain off kind of film, but it's a damn fun turn your brain off kind of film, lol. Much more violent and bloody then I expected and very nicely paced.
Great effects and pic and sound as well.
I'm in the same boat, entertaining and laugh out loud funny at times, BUT zero replay value.walls said:Hansel and Gretal Witch Hunters
Ok this is definitely a turn your brain off kind of film, but it's a damn fun turn your brain off kind of film, lol. Much more violent and bloody then I expected and very nicely paced.
Great effects and pic and sound as well.
Superior over Final Cut? Interesting. Got any links?Haywood said:There is an equally passionate contingency that thinks the Director's Cut is superior.
DIYer said:Superior over Final Cut? Interesting. Got any links?Haywood said:There is an equally passionate contingency that thinks the Director's Cut is superior.
There were no internet forums 20 years ago so it would be hard to count the hands raised.Haywood said:I was thinking about the Director's Cut vs the original and the discussions I'm referring two happened over a 20+ year period, not recently.