The imaging on these things is RIDICULOUSLY SICK! I was always impressed with the imaging of the Swans and I wasn't alone. I've had a few (non forum) analytical listeners who've made unsolicited comments about their imaging. Sure, the room, speaker placement and acoustic treatments play their roles in the matter but still the Swans held their own. These Contours have completely schooled the Swans. For the first time in years, I had to look at the display of my Pre/Pro to verify it was in Stereo mode and not some multichannel soundfield. And despite seeing the word "stereo" displayed, I still had to put an ear up to the center channel to make sure nothing was coming out of it.
I simply placed the Contours right where the Swans were - which is to say as wide as the room will allow - and that makes just over 9 feet between them and 9 feet away from my listening position. It took Steely Dan's "Cousin Dupree" to convince me I hadn't made a mistake in connecting the speaker cables and didn't have one out of phase. Anita Baker's "Fairy Tales" clearly showed 5 distinct areas where an instrument was emanating from and I don't recall ever noticing that before on that track. Admittedly, the placebo effect may be coming into play because I know I'm listening to new speakers and trying to hear the differences. Still...I am not unimpressed with any aspect of the speakers.
I played around a bit with them in full range mode and I can confidently say "NO SUB REQUIRED". They played a note in Spyro Gyra's "Monsoon" that the Swans couldn't dream about on their best day. If that's not enough, I didn't hear a difference in that note even when crossed to the subs.
In KEM's "Beautiful World" - which is a very, VERY clean recording by the way - the finger snaps were crisp and prominent sounding with the Swans but now I'm noticing an almost 3D sound to them with the Contours.
If you can't tell, I'm digging these speakers and not just a little bit.